Asger Aamund.
31.7.2026
WHO HAS EVER HEARD OF A RADICALISED NAZI?
No, no one has heard of a radicalised Nazi, since Nazism in theory and practice is considered radical in all its cruelty and dominance. When you are a Nazi, you are already defined as radicalised.
The same applies to other forms of fascism, also communism. No media or politicians have ever spoken of 'radicalised' communists, because communism from 1917 to 2000, with the killing of 100 million citizens in their own societies, is also considered a fundamentally radical movement.
There are significant differences, but there is more that unites than divides. It is thus a common feature that all three ideologies persecute, oppress and murder their own citizens. Not for what they have done, but for what they are. Be it Jews, homosexuals, democrats or infidels.
The Muslim terrorist who drove his van into Berlin's pride parade was not, however, described as part of the Islamic movement, but as 'radicalised' and an 'Islamist', that is, the lone wolf who leaves the peaceful flock and seeks his own cruel paths.
However, we have the word of the highest Islamic authorities that not only Abdul Ballout, but also Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Taliban and Hezbollah are neither radicalised nor Islamists, but all belong within the framework of the Muslim community.
In 2014, when Islamic State stood at the height of its power, the Western world was horrified by the scale and cruelty of ISIS's expansion in the Middle East. Thousands of women were captured and held as sex slaves, enemies had their throats cut in rows, and specially selected prisoners were doused with petrol in iron cages and set alight.
There was fun and games in ISIS, which nevertheless caused dismay for the Nigerian mufti Ibrahim El-Hussein. He issued a fatwa (command or ban) that condemned ISIS as heretical and expelled from Islam.
This fatwa was overturned by the highest ideological and religious authority within Sunni Islam, Al-Azhar University in Cairo, in an official statement which said that it can be debated whether ISIS stands for Islamic values, but ISIS is part of Islam.
This was a landmark and principled decision, where Al-Azhar shows no sympathy for ISIS, but establishes that the terror movement and all its deeds are located solidly within the framework of Islam's three holy scriptures, which define Islam as ideology and faith.
It also means that the never-ending stream of Islamic terror against the USA and Europe has not been carried out by 'Islamists' and the 'radicalised', but that the Allahu Akbar mass killings are part of Islam's religious and political doctrine.
Islam is thus a family, where there can be black sheep, but they too are part of the family. Blood is thicker than water.
The three Islamic holy scriptures (the Quran, hadith and sira), which govern the Muslim's life from morning to evening and from cradle to grave, constitute one long campaign of hatred and revenge against Jews, atheists, Hindus, Buddhists and all other infidels:
Quran 8:12: Allah speaks to the angels: "I will send terror into the hearts of the infidels and cut off their heads"
Quran 33:60: The infidels will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered.
In the Quran there are more Jew-hating passages than even in Hitler's 'Mein Kampf'. Based on Islam's holy scriptures, Al-Azhar University has had no other option than to admit ISIS and all other Allahu Akbar terror into the Islamic warmth.
These facts Western societies will not accept and have therefore invented concepts such as 'Islamism' and 'radicalisation', which are expressions of a conceptual pollution and an escape from reality, which means we will never be able to counter Islamic expansion and growing dominance.
We have invented our own Islam, which fits nicely into our yielding and inclusive democracies. Our Islam is a peaceful and loving religion without political doctrines and totalitarian dictates.
Therefore, Muslim terrorist attacks, rapes, vandalism and hatred of infidels are a deviation that comes from a few and most often mentally ill individuals who, as lone wolves, have strayed away from the community. These unfortunate wretches have now become radicalised and Islamists and cast an unfortunate light on the otherwise peaceful Islam.
These lone wolves have given nourishment to right-wing extremist forces that incite Islamophobia, where peaceful Muslims are subjected to hatred and persecution.
This fairy tale is the core of the Islamic-cultural outlook of Danish media and politicians and shapes their words and actions.
Immediately after the terrorist attack in Berlin, the chairman of the Danish LGBT+ movement, Susanne Branner, could state that the perpetrator must be from the German right-wing extremist environment. It couldn't be a Muslim.
Gays and lesbians harbour an unfortunate and unrequited love for Muslims, who otherwise hang them in cranes and throw them off rooftops.
We then got the usual comments about dismay and grief. Flowers were laid, hugs were given and speeches were made that promised that 'the forces of darkness' and 'Islamism' would never defeat freedom and solidarity.
We are looking in the wrong place and using all our energy to demonise Europe's civil grassroots movements like AfD and Rassemblement National instead of recognising that they are right and we are wrong.
We are a society of hard deniers who, regardless of Islam's countless attacks and atrocities, will not understand that we are up against a fascist ideology of dominance in expansion.
Al-Azhar University has without circumlocution explained to us what we are up against. We have turned a deaf ear and instead hand the matches to the arsonists.
The Muslim woman, Iman Kurdi, declares in an opinion piece in Berlingske that "I wear the headscarf because I submit to Allah - it's no longer than that".
No, because thereby she also submits to Allah's command for the extermination of Christians, Jews and all other infidels. It's no longer than that.
Good that there are some, at least, who can give us a straight answer.
31 July 2026