Questions for the Feeling Class -
Can one stand on the Western world's idea of human inviolability, sanctity and freedom ideals - and simultaneously pledge allegiance to Islam?
No.
No. It is a black/white binary fact.
Because the two are fundamentally incompatible.
For Islam is not merely a private faith. Islam is a law-religion, a complete system, where politics, jurisprudence, culture and faith are not separated. This means that the individual is not free in classical Islam.
Let me sketch out the fundamental differences for you, if they are dissolving in your modern emotional disturbance.
In Islam, the Human is not inviolable. Under sharia, the individual is always subordinate to Allah's will and the religious laws. The West is built on the idea that the human being in itself is sacred and inviolable - Islam is built on the premise that only submission under God gives value.
In Islam, Freedom does not exist in the Western sense. Freedom of speech stops where Islam is criticized. Freedom of religion does not exist; one cannot leave Islam without risking punishment - historically death.
Equality between humans is not the basic principle. There exists a built-in hierarchy - believers over unbelievers, men over women, Muslims over Jews and Christians (dhimmis). This is not a deviation, but a completely central part of the system's foundational pillars.
And here we hit the paradox.
The European consciousness is today so confused that it attempts to stand on two foundations - two incompatible cornerstones - that mutually exclude one another.
On one side the West's idea of the individual's inviolability, freedom and equality. On the other side a religion that explicitly demands submission and abandons these ideals.
One cannot do that - without tearing oneself apart in the attempt.
This is why it is misleading to reduce Islam to a "minority status". Historically speaking, Islam is the world's most expansionist and imperialistic civilization. From Spain to India, from the Balkans to North Africa, the pattern has been the same.
When the Muslim presence - that is, the Islamic mindset - grows strong enough in an area, the balance of power shifts.
And we see it again in modern times. Just look at the countries that have themselves experienced the pattern in recent history -
Egypt and Iran - once relatively secular and modern, where women in the 60s and 70s went without veils, studied and worked freely. Today - coercion, hijab and religious police.

Afghanistan - in the 70s moving toward modernity, with universities filled with women. Today Taliban, total female oppression and sharia.
Pakistan - the 50s and 60s with secular institutions, today marked by blasphemy laws and harsh Islamization.
Iraq, Syria and Libya - secular regimes, where city life was free and women went without veils - until Islamist forces and civil wars turned the societies around.
Sudan and Somalia - gradual Islamization led to dissolution, civil war and coercion.
Algeria - French-colonial legacy with secularization, but Islamist movements led to civil war in the 1990s and have infiltrated society ever since.
Should I list more - or did you catch the pattern?
Everywhere the same pattern. Not identical causes, but identical consequences.
From open, modern societies to religious control, restriction of freedom and female subjugation. And the casting of sexual minorities. From rooftops.
And this is where the real challenge lies for the Western world.
The problem is not the individual peaceful Muslim, but the pattern that follows when Islam gains a foothold. And the problem is especially the naive voices in the West, which open the door and say - "You need not fear anything. Here there is tolerance. We understand you."
For that is precisely how the pattern always begins - through the gate that is opened in tolerance and naivety.
To believe that we can unite these two foundations is an expression of an infantile boy psychology - immature understanding of the Human and how deep the Faith runs in us - a lack of ability to see patterns and learn from history. The West stands today on shaking ground, because we delude ourselves that we can unite the incompatible.
"Here it will be different, than it has been for the last 1,400 years," says the fundamentally naive blue-eyed editor-in-chief. "See how kind and good I am. Aren't I, mother!?".
To address this fundamental split and incompatibility in worldviews, culture and civilization is not identity politics and it is not a prejudice.
It is history. It is pattern.
When one pushes back - as Eva Gregersen courageously did this week regarding Muslim politicians' primary allegiance - in a fundamental split that demands renunciation of central parts of Islam's faith and message, if one wants to unite and align with Western thinking and free democracy - then one stands on something far stronger than simple identity.
One stands on historical experience - 1,400 years of documented pattern of expansion, power seizure and restriction of freedom.
One stands on human inviolability - the idea that the individual has value in itself, independent of religion or power.
One stands on freedom - the right to think, believe, doubt, criticize and choose for oneself.
One stands on equality - the principle that men and women, believers and non-believers, all have the same fundamental rights.
One stands on the Western heritage - a civilization that - with all its flaws - has built the freest, most equal and most humane societies the world has ever seen.
To push back against Islam as a system is therefore not to display intolerance. It is to defend the most valuable thing we have.
What one must make clear to oneself is that all of this - human inviolability, freedom, equality, the Western heritage - rounded off by our understanding and connection to Christianity's God - in these years is being sacrificed on the altar to the new false gods - "inclusion and tolerance".
The price for this will not be a feeling of kindness.
The price will be that the next generations must grow up in unfreedom and subjugation.
For that is how the pattern Islam plays out in the endgame.
Every time.
Behold it.
It is not a price I am prepared to pay.
The question is whether you are.
❤️🔥🪽
…
And thanks to Eva and her tireless contribution.
She stands where the Western-minded man ought to stand. And it is time many more position themselves together with her, beside her and in front of her.
And I want to add.
I have nothing personal against either Muslims or Islam.
If one wishes to live in full accordance with Allah, there exists a world filled with Islamic societies that are arranged precisely that way.
But one must make it clear.
Here it is different. And I am not here to discuss whether that is "okay", or how we can meet in the middle.
I am here to tell how it is here - so the rules are clear. And if one does not play by the mindset, values, orientation and understanding that leads to the Western world - then one does not belong here.
For there exist no concessions one can make toward a mindset that - every time - ends up like the arrangement of Islamic societies, as we know them in history and in the present.
